Subject	17 x 10 +41 - +44 works
Posted by	na300zx (OH) on May 09, 2008 at 5:35 AM
	This message has been viewed 122 times.
In Reply To	Acceptable offsets by wheel width and/or diameter... posted by 240Z FeO2 on May 08, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Message	I have +44, and I know that people have used +41 (like you said).
Follow Ups	quick wheel fitment question? - pocheeyo 23:09:20 05/08/08 Acceptable offsets by wheel width and/or diameter... - 240Z FeO2 23:17:10 05/08/08 17x9.5 _36 fit fine on the front of my Z32 - sfarrah 23:49:24 05/08/08 17 x 10 +41 - +44 works - na300zx (OH) 05:35:32 05/09/08 18x10 +50 works for me (n/m) - SkiFly01 08:30:57 05/09/08 how much clearance do you have from the strut assembly? - PearlWhite300zx 10:01:52 05/09/08 I have the camera at work so. - SkiFly01 13:07:21 05/09/08 ah well, would have been nice (n/m) - pocheeyo 23:21:28 05/08/08 What size would spacers need to be? - pocheeyo 23:47:23 05/08/08 Spacers can reduce too large of a postive offset. But - 240Z FeO2 23:57:36 05/08/08 Those are Z33/G35 offsets. The rear will not work. - Scotts94z32 09:41:24 05/09/08 18x9.5 +20 in the rear of mine - SC300Z 11:31:45 05/09/08 what size tire are you running? (n/m) - sfarrah 12:09:46 05/09/08 Re: what size tire are you running? - SC300Z 14:03:28 05/09/08 I would have thought those would have rubbed the fender - sfarrah 15:58:06 05/09/08 I have a similar setup - tuckz32 13:20:57 05/09/08 My Hart c2 was 18x8.5 +28 up front - SuparexTT 14:12:26 05/09/08 It'll work but you'd have to roll the fenders in the rear - Mike(La Canada) 16:24:47 05/09/08 how much negative camber are you running currently? (n/m) - got rice? 21:44:00 05/09/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.